Because People Matter

Steele Trap: How the Steele, RNC Debacle Spotlights GOP Tokenism

by Roger White

On more than one occasion the new Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele has cast himself as the black anti-Obama; someone who, because of his race, age and savvy is uniquely positioned to articulate an effective counter to the President’s agenda. He’s even gone so far as to claim he would run for president himself “if God told him to.” But Steele’s early stumbles reveal more than just a lack of political finesse and humility. They reveal the deep discord between the substance of racial inclusion and the cultural and ideological limits of the GOP. They also highlight fault-lines between different factions of the black conservative movement.

Steele was elected into the leadership ranks of the national Republican Party by a hundred or so Capital insiders because the Party needed to present a face to the American electorate that neutralized the powerful multi-cultural symbolism that the Democrats embodied in the wake of Obama’s 2008 victory. It’s not that the Democrats don’t have their own racial baggage and legacy of discrimination.  One could plausibly argue that Michael Steele and his top of the ticket running mate Robert Ehrlich beat Kathleen Kennedy Townsend in the 2002 Maryland gubernatorial race because of Townsend’s decision to choose an obscure, white retired admiral for a running mate instead of rewarding the black communities decades long Party loyalty and electoral clout (blacks make up a third of the state’s electorate) by putting an African American on the ticket.  But this much is clear. On racial justice issues, the further away we get from Reconstruction the worse the GOP looks.  

Individual Mandate: Step in the Wrong Direction

By Roger White
 
If the Democrats are able to pass their version of health care reform this winter it will include an individual mandate that every US citizen buy private health insurance except for a small percentage of people who qualified for a hardship exemption.  For decades the American right developed a deserved reputation for being eager to legislate morality in sexual, personal and family affairs. Today the liberal left rivals conservatives in their desire to use state power to regulate, prohibit and control what only recently used to be considered private matters.  Due to technological advances and the slow but steady erosion of the Fourth Amendment at the hands of the war on terror and drugs, the very concept of privacy has become quaint. Cameras on every street corner are no longer some Orwellian nightmare; they’re just a normal part of America’s domestic security and safety architecture.

No Hope Ending the War on Drugs

Obama signaled left, turns to the right on drug war

By Roger White

The initial euphoria surrounding George Bush’s departure and the election of the first Black president in US history is just about over. For decades people advocating for an end to the war against drugs have been fighting an uphill battle against law-and-order conservatives and a liberal establishment that has shown more ambiguity than moral clarity